SACRAMENTO—Some students don’t know what to make of popular drama teacher Marie Bain’s dismissal from her job at Loretto High School.
She was fired from the all girls school by Bishop William Wiegand after a parent sent in a picture of her escorting clients into a Planned Parenthood medical clinic.
‘It’s very disappointing,” said Katharyn McLearan of Planned Parenthood.
Planned Parenthood says Bain volunteered once a week to help clients past abortion protestors who picketed here several times a week.
“It’s very daunting to have people yelling at you and she was here to be a friendly face. She would wear a planned parenthood vest, just really welcome them in,” said McLearan.
But, Bishop Wiegand’s dismissal order said that Bain’s, “public participation in the procurement of abortions is morally inappropriate and unacceptable.”
“We can’t have it,” said Dom Puglisi, Catholic Schools superintendent.
Puglisi says teachers can hold private beliefs, but their public actions can’t conflict with the teachings of the church.
“Parents have made a commitment to send their children to a catholic school so they have certain expectations on us,” said Puglisi.
Bain’s performance in the classroom was never in question. She got high marks for being a dynamic and passionate teacher.”
A Loretto sophomore says weighing the actions of a popular teacher when they conflict with religious beliefs can be tough for many students,"you don’t want to go against your faith, but then there’s someone you really like and so it’s hard, you don’t know what to do.”
Bishop Wiegand asked that Bain’s dismissal be handled with dignity and sensitivity, but wanted it done quickly.
-> Posted by Carin / May 20, 2008
-> Posted by Cat / Jan 16, 2008
It is written not just in the contract but repeatedly in the Application. As a private, faith-based entity, the Catholic church has the legal right to make this decision. She failed to reveal this past to those hiring AND stated she would repeat this action willingly. BTW, the policy is based on church doctrine, not on a poll."
-> Posted by Franclyn / Jul 17, 2007
-> Posted by Alison DeGrazzio / Jul 09, 2007
-> Posted by MaryKathryn, hermit / Nov 07, 2005
Victims of clergy abuse have paved the wave for the protections of children in the future -- why isn't there the same public passion against the molestation of precious children? Do Catholics fear public ridicule similar to these postings?"
-> Posted by Debby Bodkin / Nov 07, 2005
This is the culture that allow children to be sexually abused, without corrective action."
-> Posted by Debby Bodkin / Nov 07, 2005
-> Posted by gabe Sanchez / Nov 07, 2005
-> Posted by David Marquez / Nov 07, 2005
-> Posted by Mary Kathryn / Nov 02, 2005
If we don't teach our children to respect those freedoms, then our society will never be free from hate crimes and judgment by those Catholics who believe somehow, they possess some type of superior standing because they are Catholic."
-> Posted by Debby Bodkin / Nov 02, 2005
-> Posted by Kelly / Nov 02, 2005
States. The child molestation issues should have totally bankrupted this organization years ago. Anyone who still has faith should repent and go elsewhere for religious satisfaction. This is just another example."
-> Posted by Krap / Oct 27, 2005
-> Posted by Val / Oct 24, 2005
A teacher in a Catholic school, who volunteered for Planned Parenthood, BEFORE employment, did not violate any laws of our country or the Catholic Church.
Any parent who runs around a campus showing pictures of a teacher with intent to lead a "WITCH HUNT", has committed a crime. Children should not have to witness this type of HATE on a school campus."
-> Posted by Debby Bodkin / Oct 22, 2005
When I worked for the State of CA in Civil Rights, I was castigated for visiting the Simon Weisenthal Center for Religious Tolerance. All Catholic websites were banned.
Specious arguments about "freedom of speech" ring hollow when those who cite them fail to mention the rights of women to speak out for the right to life in their own church and school.
I guess that's what you call "freedom", Mr Stalin."
-> Posted by Lissa / Oct 21, 2005
1.She was terminated for something she did PRIOR to her employment by the diocese.
2.It is unclear what her offending actions were. She used to be a volunteer in a place that, among other things, performs abortions.
3.Never been Catholic, but I went to a Catholic school long enough to assure you that the most cold hearted people I have ever known have been Catholic priests."
-> Posted by Toby in Sacto / Oct 21, 2005
Either way, what happened to the guaranteed freedoms of speech, press and opinion -- do they still exist in Sacramento?"
-> Posted by Debby Bodkin / Oct 21, 2005
But there is ABSOLUTELY nothing in Prop. 73 that guarantees parents that their teens will talk to them. Prop. 73 is an empty initiative that promises parents that their teens will be safe, but in the end delivers nothing. The irony is it does the opposite -- it harms teens."
-> Posted by Val / Oct 21, 2005
-> Posted by Arnoldstein'sRINO / Oct 20, 2005
-> Posted by Arnoldstein'sRINO / Oct 20, 2005
-> Posted by Andrew / Oct 20, 2005
2) The only arguments in favor of Mrs. Bain's actions have come from pro-abortion zealots and are anything but rational. This goes double for the arguments against Prop. 73.
3) To those who claim to have left the Church over things like this: I believe you never really accepted the teachings of the Church and/or never lived by them. This is just a lame excuse."
-> Posted by Ted M. in Reno / Oct 20, 2005
In my opinion, NO contract can hold Ms. Bain to standards BEFORE she was hired by the Sacramento Diocese.
If the Church is allowed to intimidate and fire employees, parents, students and members illegally and whenever a rich and powerful parent leads a WITCH HUNT, the Catholic Church is in bigger trouble than we ever realized."
-> Posted by info@catholics4justice.com / Oct 19, 2005
I'm voting against Prop. 73 because not all teens live in a Brady Bunch word, but all teens deserve to be safe."
-> Posted by Val / Oct 19, 2005
The government can't mandate families to talk to each other. As a parent it's my responsibility to talk to my kids about all things concerning sex including abstinence. But if for some reason they can't or won't come to me, I'm not going to jeopardize their safety for my "right to know." That's why I'm voting NO."
-> Posted by Val / Oct 19, 2005
-> Posted by Arnoldstein'sRINO / Oct 19, 2005
-> Posted by Andrew / Oct 19, 2005
Bishop Wiegand is now protecting the teachings of the Church against abortion, by terminating an employee for association with Planned Parenthood, BEFORE Ms. Bain was employed at Loretto HS. Is this something Jesus would do? I think not."
-> Posted by bodkind@hotmail.com / Oct 19, 2005
They also counsel their patients, probably more than the Church did to the victims of their representatives. Unless you consider telling a young male rape victim to be quiet and not tell anyone counseling."
-> Posted by Toby iin Sacto / Oct 19, 2005
-> Posted by Toby in Sacto / Oct 19, 2005
Those in leadership are held to a higher standard, and consequences for our chioces- good or bad- are sure to come to pass.
Let us focus on the plank in our own eye instead of the speck in our brother's."
-> Posted by Cheryl / Oct 19, 2005
Gone?? Your right on that matter, problem is, they've just been " relocated ".
Name the priest who've been shuffled who SHOULD be in jail.
The bishop screwed up....why didn't this woman get the same type of treatment that the whacko pedophile priest got?
A quiet removal to another location??
( After some serious VALUE discussions tho )"
-> Posted by Leo of Sacramento / Oct 19, 2005
-> Posted by Randall Stepanek / Oct 19, 2005
We must pray that Bishop Wiegand does not violate CA Whistleblower protections by punishing the Loretto HS principal who chose to do the right thing, by respecting Ms. Bain's civil rights and due process.
This type of poor judgment in the clergy sex abuse scandals has almost destroyed the Catholic Church? Why is this continuing?
Debby Bodkin
info@catholics4justice.com"
-> Posted by Debby Bodkin / Oct 19, 2005
-> Posted by Arnoldstein'sRINO / Oct 18, 2005
-> Posted by Arnoldstein'sRINO / Oct 18, 2005
-> Posted by Arnoldstein'sRINO / Oct 18, 2005
-> Posted by Chris / Oct 18, 2005
We FIRE a teacher for being seen at an abortion clinic. Hmmm....
Fire a teacher, but save a Pedophile Priest.
Yea.....right......."
-> Posted by Leo of Sacramento / Oct 18, 2005
It is great to know SOME Catholic Bishops hold fast to the faith.
Just think of it: Catholics want Catholics who ACTUALLY believe in and follow Church teaching to instruct their children.
Wow.
What an idea!"
-> Posted by Craig Kelso / Oct 18, 2005
Bishop Wiegand might want to think twice before he tries to rid the church of pro-choice parishioners. If he's successful he's going to find a lot of empty pews and collection baskets."
-> Posted by Ana / Oct 18, 2005
-> Posted by Arnoldstein'sRINO / Oct 18, 2005
-> Posted by Arnoldstein'sRINO / Oct 18, 2005
A lay woman tries to help young girls in trouble, he has no idea what she was doing, just that she was there, and she is to be terminated immediately.
How does this compare with the treatment of numerous priests who committed all sorts of felonious and reprehensible acts with young boys. They are relocated quietly, no risk of prison or other repurcussions after scarring young people for life"
-> Posted by Toby in Sacto / Oct 18, 2005