Very curious, curious indeed that a legal and political system that will spend some 12-14-million dollars, and invest 20 or more years in trying to not carry out a sentence of death delivered unto a one Scott Peterson for the premeditated murder of his wife and child is torn over whether or not to extend similar angst to the premeditated killing of the innocent and helpless Terri Schiavo.
By this point it is, or should be unnecessary to rehash the questions surrounding how she came to be in her present so-called “persistent vegetative state”; or for that matter the question of whether or not she is even in fact in such a state given the suspension of her therapy when her husband, Michael suddenly remembered her wish to die, right after receiving a medical malpractice award and damages to the tune of a million and a half smackers. It is, or ought to be unnecessary to again belabor the point at which this alleged wish of hers should have been invoked would have been at the time the tube was first inserted, or that when it was first pulled in 2001 that it was ordered re-inserted because of testimony before the court from one of Michael’s girl friends that he had “lied” about Terri’s “wishes”.
It ought to also be unnecessary as well to point out that there is no “plug’ to be “pulled”, but only food and water to be withheld. This constitutes a method of execution prohibited by both conscience and law. If such an end is acceptable then why pray tell is it not acceptable for a nurse to smother Terri with a pillow and have done with the evil deed? If you are uncomfortable with that idea then you must ask yourself a two part question: Why and what is the difference between the two methods of execution?
You know the drill. You will find over 150 stories, stretching back years about this case at
Worldnetdaily.com. Suffice to say that there are questions about Ms. Shiavo’s rights, her civil rights i.e. her right to life that have not been properly addressed or answered.
It is precisely situations like this when the Federal Government has not only the right, but the
obligation to step in and examine not only all the facts of the case, but the larger question of whether or not the lower jurisdictions involved have properly safeguarded the Ms. Shiavos involved.
As I pointed out during my weekly appearance on the national Fox News Channel yesterday, if Ms. Schiavo had been turned away from a voting booth then the Feds would be crawling all over Florida authorities like ants, and doing so with the blessing of both the political left and right.
This is one of those issues in which I am glad to be neither conservative nor liberal, for this is an issue of the conflict between the worship of evil versus the worship of good. That there exists a question about this poor woman’s condition, her wishes and the motivation of the individual who has fought to kill her is enough for those who worship good to rally to her cause and error on the side of life, at least so long as those questions reasonably hang in the air.
Liberals hypocritically decry the Big Brother invasion of big government in a family issue. Really? I am supposed to take that position seriously, coming from the political ideology that claims the right to place me in jail for spanking my child?
Conservatives, Republicans in particular deny their own proud heritage of being the parents of Federal intervention to protect the rights of citizens both individual and in specific classes when those citizens find their rights at peril due to state action or state inaction. It is a matter of of noteworthy history, and a watershed in the advancement of human rights that it was Republicans, lead by Mr. Lincoln who took that obligation, and the judgment of the Almighty and history so seriously as to risk, fight and win a civil war in order to assert such an unpopular idea. Strangely it has been the democrats in recent years who claim that mantel, yet history hath shown that their entire party history has been one of advocating slavery – both actual and economic - and who have formed an alliance with some republicans to make the notion of standing for life an unpopular notion in this case.
Now the worship of death, masked in the cloak of its chief ally – political correctness - has so polluted the thinking of this nation that we actually debate whether or not this poor, sick woman – a crime victim in the minds of some - should have even a niggardly portion of those rights we force upon vile, filthy killers.
My God, what have we come to?
Listen to KFBK weeknights from 7-10 PM for details on how you may join in me banging pots and pans for immigration reform in the very belly of the beast, on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC. this April 23-28!
Listen to 1530 AM KFBK weeknights from 7-10 PM for details on how you may join in me banging pots and pans for immigration reform in the very belly of the beast, on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC. this April 23-28!
Mark Williams is a member of the Society of Professional Journalists, and Investigative Reporters and Editors Inc. His work appears in this publication, on
Fox News Channel and nightly on Sacramento’s
1530 AM KFBK radio. For more on Mark and his background visit his
web site.