After much discussion State Senator Gilbert Cedillo (D-Los Angeles), the man behind the driver's licenses for illegal aliens, will appear on my program. He will be in-studio this Wednesday night at 7:00 PM for a one-on-one debate with me for part of the show, and to take listener calls for the balance of the hour.

This is the first time that the Senator has ventured into hostile talk-radio waters. His current bill (SB 60, same bill number and text as last time) is currently working its way through the legislative system. This time the Senator has the help of Hollywood, along with the usual line-up of supporters. The votes to pass it may not be there, the governor's signature always a question and public opinion against the idea is as strong as ever. So why press on? That will be one of my questions, I want yours, the Senator has agreed to answer them.

Senator Gil Cedillo versus Mark Williams, with listener calls as the wildcard. Wednesday night 7 - 8 PM ONLY on KFBK (1530 AM)

Listen to KFBK weeknights from 7-10 PM for details on how you may join in me banging pots and pans for immigration reform in the very belly of the beast, on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC. this April 23-28!

Mark Williams
Weeknights 7 - 10 PM
News/Talk 1530 KFBK AM

Regarding Craig's posting (below):

Red stars and labels, a fine idea.

Now, who shall we have print up and install the pink triangles for professors who “indoctrinate” homosexuality and the yellow stars for those who preach Zionism?

The medal to be awarded the Hitlerjugen pasting stars about the campus already exists; it’s called the Iron Cross. Who ever knew that it would come back into vogue?


Meanwhile, back in California, USA, a pair of state senators seek to legislate when the police may and may not chase a suspect. The exact languge of the bill is still being worked out. In fact, one of the senators - Grass Valley Republican Sam Aanestad, the bill's co-author wants your input on that languge.

One-size fits all on the streets mandated by guys in suits, or needed law. You tell Aanestad this Monday night at 7:00 on KFBK.


Listen to KFBK weeknights from 7-10 PM for details on how you may join in me banging pots and pans for immigration reform in the very belly of the beast, on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC. this April 23-28!

Mark Williams
Weeknights 7 - 10 PM
News/Talk 1530 KFBK AM

Instructors at Santa Rosa Junior College are in an uproar because of student protests against the propagation of communism in the classroom.

I want to know why the instructors aren't protesting with them.

The Santa Rosa Press Democrat Reports:

Santa Rosa Junior College's oak-studded campus is aflame with controversy triggered by the anonymous posting of red stars and a reference to communist indoctrination on 10 faculty office doors.

Instructors quickly saw the action as a threat to academic freedom, but the student who claimed credit for the protest said it was about left-leaning bias in the lecture hall.

But what was interesting about this protest was what accompanied the stars.

The stars, which unnerved some instructors, were accompanied by a copy of a state Education Code section prohibiting the teaching of communism with the "intent to indoctrinate" students.

Instructors have vowed to have the State Education Code changed. But it doesn’t say that communism can’t be taught. It simply prohibits “the teaching of communism with the ‘intent to indoctrinate’ students.” Unless they intend to indoctrinate these students with communist propaganda for the purpose of making them communists, there is no need to change the law.

But this is not what they are arguing! They are not trying to defend the content of what they wish to teach, They are trying to protect the intent behind what they teach. “What intent?” you ask?

The article quotes philosophy instructor, George Freund, “The Advocacy of Communism”

But hey… There’s not left wing bias on college campuses? Yeah Right!

Someone get this student a medal!

(Click Pic For More)

Posted by:

Visit The Home of Uncommon Sense…
www.craigdeluz.com

In the upcoming special election to fill long time congressman Robert Matsui the clear front runner is, sigh, his widow Doris Matsui. Other than her name there is virtually no reason whatsoever to vote for Doris. She has almost zero qualifications.

Yes, she is a widow and that sucks bad. But being the widow of a congressman does not a congresswoman make. If God forbid my wife were to pass away I would NOT be a good choice to replace her as a speech therapist. Why? Because I know next to nothing about speech therapy. Simply being married to someone does not qualify you to do the same job they do. I couldn't speech theraperize my way out of a paper bag.

Doris Matsui has never held an elected office. The only qualification she may have is her being a lobbyist. That's about it. Yet she is going to win decidely nonetheless.

Have any of you Sacramento area folks seen her commercials? They're awful. They offer no substance whatsoever and explain virutally nothing about her position on any issue. She says she is for social security the way it is in one ad. Standard Democrat line. Nothing more, nothing less.

Her competition is also extremely unqualified but in their unqualificationness (CORRECTION: Upon further review, John Thomas Flynn IS qualified and should be voted for instead of Doris Matsui) several are still more qualified than Doris. It is a terrible, sad fact that this is how our system works. Actually, it is a sad reflection on how dull many voters are. She is going to win in a landslide only because she shares her late husband's name.

Oh well, there is nothing I can do. Matsui will win handily. At least I can take comfort in the fact that Republicans wouldn't do this...oh wait, Mary Bono...D'oh!

For more visit The Wrong Blog
email The Wrong Blog

The Sacramento News and Review saw fit to publish my commentary on the sad state the 5th Congressional District race is. I think they agree that DC Democrats have no place selecting our representatives.

Too bad the Sacramento Bee did not see fit to stand up to the establishment as well. (But I guess that is a little difficult when you are part of the establishment.) At least they admit that Matsui has ethical issues:

“… Matsui disclosed her past partnerships with real estate developer Angelo Tsakopoulos. These partnerships represented a serious lapse of judgment, especially since Tsakopoulos has sometimes contacted Congress for help on regulatory relief and other matters.”

They continue on to point out that her effectiveness could be compromised because she has lost touch with Sacramento:

“she will need to demonstrate a connection to Sacramento, a place where she hasn't lived full-time for many years.”

This lame endorsement by the Bee is no surprise to those who follow their liberal leaning endorsement practices. If one looks at the major races (Sacramento City Council, County Supervisor on up) an interesting pattern starts to immerge.

In a race that is in a moderate to Democrat district, they will endorse the Democrat frontrunner (no matter how poor a candidate he/she may be) over the Republican frontrunner (no matter how good a candidate he/she may be.) And in a Republican leaning district, they tend to choose the more liberal of the two GOP candidates. That is unless the conservative is a major frontrunner or an incumbent.

I know that I am not the only one who has noticed this trend. And the Sacramento Bee refused to admit that the ideological (liberal ideology) bent of their editorial staff, is clouding their judgment in the endorsement process.

The fact is, they are just at out of touch with Sacramento as Doris Matusi. But what makes them worse is that have been here, in town. But I guess one’s perspective isn’t exactly the same from the Ivory Tower.

(Click Pic For More)

Posted by:

Visit The Home of Uncommon Sense…
www.craigdeluz.com