|
“The contents of this blog are not necessarily the thoughts or opinions of The Sacramento Union.”
Friday, November 26, 2004
|
Abortion! Because Lynching is for Amateurs!
**UPDATE**
Monday, November 29th
Teens For Life Director, John Vickers will be on TODAY'S show. Don't Miss it!
Thanks to Teens For Life, the truth about what Planned Parenthood is really up to is in the news. (Check it out Here)
It just so happens that I wrote the following about this issue in my personal Blog at CraigDeluz.com two weeks ago.
If Blacks want to know why we should be against abortion, they only need check out this site http://www.klannedparenthood.com . The abortion rights movement has accomplished through Planned Parenthood what the Klu Klux Klan could only have dreamed.
Consider the following:
A black baby is now more than three times as likely to be murdered in the womb than a white baby.
Since 1973, abortion has reduced the black population by over 25 percent. Twice as many African-Americans have died from abortion than have died fromAIDS, accidents, violent crimes, cancer, and heart disease combined.
Every three days, more African-Americans are killed by abortion thanhave been killed by the Ku Klux Klan in its entire history.
Planned Parenthood operates the nation's largest chain of abortion clinics andalmost 80 percent of its facilities are located in minority neighborhoods.
About 13 percent of American women are black, but they submit to over 35 percent of the abortions.
Is somebody trying to tell us something?
Craig DeLuz
Listen in to Uncommon Sense Raido
Weekdays from 4:00 pm to 6:00 pm
97.7 KDEE FM
Also, Visit the Home of Uncommon Sense...
http://www.craigdeluz.com
blogged by: Craig DeLuz
Published: November 26, 2004, 2:46 pm | Permalink | Printable Version
|

Thursday, November 25, 2004
|
Journalistic Agendas Exposed
Coming Friday to ABC News and 20/20...
In their first public interview since attacking gay college student Matthew Shepard, his killers said they were motivated not by homophobia, but the prospect of robbery to fuel a methamphetamine binge.
"He was pretty well-dressed, had a wallet full of money," Aaron McKinney said of meeting Shepard at a Laramie bar in October 1998. "All I wanted to do was beat him up and rob him. ... Seemed like a good idea at the time."
McKinney said he killed Shepard because he was strung out on drugs, not because Shepard was gay. Henderson agreed, saying "it's not because me and Aaron had anything against gays or any of that."
McKinney said Shepard was sitting at the bar when he and Henderson arrived, and at one point McKinney asked Shepard for a cigarette.
"He said he was too drunk to go home and then he asked me if I'd give him a ride," McKinney said.
In the truck, McKinney claimed, the two learned Shepard wanted sex in return for giving them drugs, but McKinney decided to rob Shepard instead.
According to McKinney, Shepard grabbed his leg and he struck Shepard with his gun and demanded money. Although Shepard handed over his wallet, the beating continued.
"Sometimes when you have that rage going through you, there's no stopping it," McKinney said. "I've attacked my best friends coming off of meth binges."
They decided to dump Shepard in a secluded spot, and when they came upon a rustic fence blocking the road, McKinney decided to tie him to it.
"Then when I'm leaving, he says he's going to tell on me," McKinney said. "I went back and hit him one more time. I hit him real hard that time."
These two deserve every consequence that law can afford them, but...look at the media's hypocritical journalism. Where is the attention surrounding Joseph Rudulph? Remember, Jessie Dirkhising? You might want to do some research on this homosexual crime and murder.
Hate Crime legislation is ridiculous and the media ignoring crimes because they don't FIT the agenda of the liberal left is criminal itself.
Still waiting, where is the Sacramento Bee on the Joseph Rudulph story?
Hogue Show on 1380 KTKZ
blogged by: Eric Hogue
Published: November 25, 2004, 2:25 pm | Permalink | Printable Version
|

Tuesday, November 23, 2004
|
Fortune 500 Companies Bend to Anti-Family Preasure
On Today's Show we will be discussing a group called the Human Rights Campaign who has been successfully pressuring major companies to supporting their Gay, Lesbian & Transgender lifestyles.
They do so by sending surveys to these companies asking if they provide special benefits and protections for those who chose to live these lifestyles. And if they don’t respond or respond unfavorably, they apply pressure to force the company to change.
But they don’t stop there!
They even go as far as reviewing their IRS filings to see if the company gave any funds to pro-family organizations. And if they do, they are labeled as bigoted and anti-human rights.
The criteria for the company to get a high rating includes the following:
1. Include the words “ sexual orientation” in their primary written non-discrimination policy.
2. Include the words “gender identity” or “gender identity and/or expression” in their primary written non-discrimination policy.
3. Offer health insurance coverage to employees’ same-sex domestic partners firm-wide; or provide cash compensation to employees to purchase health insurance for a domestic partner on their own.
4. Officially recognize and support a gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender employee resource group; or would support employees’ forming a GLBT employee resource group if some expressed interest by providing space and other resources; or have a firm-wide diversity council or working group whose mission specifically includes GLBT diversity.
5. Offer diversity training that includes sexual orientation and/or gender identity and expression in the workplace.
6. Engage in respectful and appropriate marketing to the gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender community and/or provide support through their corporate foundation or otherwise to GLBT health, educational, political or community organizations or events.
7. Engage in corporate action that would undermine the goal of equal rights for gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender people.
Now, it is well within their rights to conduct this effort. However, it is well within our rights, as supporters of traditional values to do the same. I plan to review the survey for companies that they rate highly and put them on my “Won’t get my money!” list.
If you believe in protecting traditional values, I encourage you to do the same!
Craig DeLuz
Listen in to Uncommon Sense Raido
Weekdays from 4:00 pm to 6:00 pm
97.7 KDEE FM
Also, Visit the Home of Uncommon Sense...
www.craigdeluz.com
blogged by: Craig DeLuz
Published: November 23, 2004, 12:18 pm | Permalink | Printable Version
|

Monday, November 22, 2004
|
Arnold’s Intelligence and Congress’ Bill
Did you notice the stumbling block inside of the Intelligence Bill on the Hill in DC?
From the New York Times today:
Mr. Bush intervened to try to rescue the talks about 7 p.m. Friday, when he telephoned Mr. Sensenbrenner from aboard Air Force One, en route to Chile, with a plea that Mr. Sensenbrenner compromise and drop his insistence that the bill contain a provision banning the issuance of driver's licenses to illegal immigrants.
Mr. Sensenbrenner had long championed the idea, which he depicted as a means of blocking terrorists from obtaining official government identification; several of the Sept. 11 hijackers had been issued driver's licenses. But it was opposed by White House officials and many lawmakers from both parties as unnecessary and an infringement on the rights of state governments.
"What the president was stressing to me was that he would like to get this issue off the table because the Congressional agenda and the presidential agenda were going to be very ambitious" next year, Mr. Sensenbrenner said of Mr. Bush's request for quick passage of an intelligence bill. "I didn't want to give up on the driver's license provision," he said. "But out of respect for him, if he asked me to, I said I would give up on it."
But in dropping the driver's license provision, Mr. Sensenbrenner told the other negotiators that he wanted to reintroduce other law enforcement and immigration provisions, including a measure that would give new discretion to immigration officials in deciding whether to grant political asylum to immigrants. The Senate negotiators and House Democrats said the new provisions, which have been strongly opposed by civil liberties groups, were equally unacceptable.
This measure inside of the Intelligence Bill could help Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger in dealing with this issue inside of California...either way, if it stays or if it goes.
Daniel Weintraub remarks;
"Either way, the bill has the potential to get Gov. Schwarzenegger off the hook. Obviously, if the feds ban them, his hands are tied and he can quit negotiating with California Democrats who are pushing him to approve the licenses. If Sensenbrenner drops his move and the bill instead contains guidelines for the states to use, then the governor can apply those and tell conservatives he is simply following federal law."
This is something we have talked about on 1380 KTKZ for a number of months. Congress has had their eyes on state driver's license issue since early summer. This is the saving grace for Arnold in dealing with Gil Cedillo, Fabian Nunez, Art Torres, the Latino Caucus and even Mike Spence of the CRA that wants to run out "The Son of 187" once again.
Hogue Show on 1380 KTKZ
blogged by: Eric Hogue
Published: November 22, 2004, 4:19 pm | Permalink | Printable Version
|

|
The Battle over the Budget, Round Two
Starting in December, the "Beast' is back in session and one of the major issues for the Democrats will be raising taxes for the next budget, not to mention Assemblyman Mark Leno's "Same Sex Marriage Bill".
After the "Fiscal Recall" of Gray Davis, the liberal legislature was weak in driving new taxes against the popularity and presentation of Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger.
Last year, Democrats predicted that budget would be the last without tax increases. They pledged to force their governmental spending initiatives after things 'cooled down' surrounding the sizzle of first year 'Governor Arnold in the Capitol', but they have problem to content with this season...Schwarzenegger's budget leadership has worked.
California has a rising revenue source and a single-digit deficit, compared to Davis' mammoth $20-25 billion hole. Now, the issue of raising taxes is more remote than after the passing of the 2004-05 budget.
"There's no question you can balance this year's budget without a tax increase. But the question really is whether the Legislature is going to be able to make the difficult decisions necessary for fiscal responsibility," said Assemblyman Keith Richman, R-Northridge, a moderate who said no options, including tax increases, should be eliminated from consideration at this point.
Republicans, including Schwarzenegger's new finance chief and GOP lawmakers, are already drawing lines against tax hikes.
"Tax increases are not a way for us to gain more jobs in California and make more people self-sufficient," said Assemblywoman Sharon Runner, R-Lancaster.
She said budget writers can find savings in other ways, such as using some of the 1,200 recommendations of the California Performance Review. The massive review of state government efficiency is likely to help shape the governor's upcoming budget.
I remember the critiques when I decided to 'go for the win' with the pragmatic choice of Arnold Schwarzenegger over the purist vote for State Senator Tom McClintock. Many of the conservatives scolded me for the choice and said, "Hogue, don’t plan on asking for any help lobbying against the Arnold tax increases next spring if this election goes the way you plan. Stopping Cruz’s tax increases would be a piece of cake, but stopping Arnold’s “emergency compromise” will be impossible."
All I have to say is...who is Cruz (Bustamante) and what new taxes are you referring to?
Hogue Show on 1380 KTKZ
blogged by: Eric Hogue
Published: November 22, 2004, 3:24 pm | Permalink | Printable Version
|
|